RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antenatal pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) in women without prior urinary incontinence (UI) are effective in reducing postnatal UI; however, UK midwives often do not provide advice and information to women on undertaking PFME, with evidence that among women who do receive advice, many do not perform PFME. METHODS: The primary aim of this feasibility and pilot cluster randomised controlled trial is to provide a potential assessment of the feasibility of undertaking a future definitive trial of a midwifery-led antenatal intervention to support women to perform PFME in pregnancy and reduce UI postnatally. Community midwifery teams in participating NHS sites comprise trial clusters (n = 17). Midwives in teams randomised to the intervention will be trained on how to teach PFME to women and how to support them in undertaking PFME in pregnancy. Women whose community midwifery teams are allocated to control will receive standard antenatal care only. All pregnant women who give birth over a pre-selected sample month who receive antenatal care from participating community midwifery teams (clusters) will be sent a questionnaire at 10-12 weeks postpartum (around 1400-1500 women). Process evaluation data will include interviews with midwives to assess if the intervention could be implemented as planned. Interviews with women in both trial arms will explore their experiences of support from midwives to perform PFME during pregnancy. Data will be stored securely at the Universities of Birmingham and Exeter. Results will be disseminated through publications aimed at maternity service users, clinicians, and academics and inform a potential definitive trial of effectiveness. The West Midlands-Edgbaston Research Ethics Committee approved the study protocol. DISCUSSION: Trial outcomes will determine if criteria to progress to a definitive cluster trial are met. These include women's questionnaire return rates, prevalence of UI, and other health outcomes as reported by women at 10-12 weeks postpartum. Progress to a definitive trial however is likely to be prevented in the UK context by new perinatal pelvic health service, although this may be possible elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10833250 . Registered 09/03/2020.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This paper examines knowledge exchange dynamics in a specialist integrated intellectual (learning) disability service, comprising specialist healthcare provision with social care commissioning and management, and considers their significance in terms of integrated service delivery. METHODS: A qualitative study focusing on knowledge exchange and integrated services. Semi-structured interviews (n = 25) were conducted with members of an integrated intellectual disability service in England regarding their perceptions of knowledge exchange within the service and the way in which knowledge exchange impinges on the operation of the integrated service. RESULTS: Exchange of 'explicit' (codifiable) knowledge between health and care management components of the service is problematic because of a lack of integrated clinical governance and related factors such as IT and care record systems and office arrangements. Team meetings and workplace interactions allowed for informal exchange of explicit and 'tacit' (non-codifiable) knowledge, but presented challenges in terms of knowledge exchange completeness and sustainability. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge exchange processes play an important role in the functioning of integrated services incorporating health and care management components. Managers need to ensure that knowledge exchange processes facilitate both explicit and tacit knowledge exchange and do not rely excessively on informal, 'ad hoc' interactions. Research on integrated services should take account of micro-scale knowledge exchange dynamics and relationships between social dynamics and physical factors.
